The article discusses the FCC chair Brendan Carr's proposal to eliminate the national broadcast ownership cap, which currently restricts a single company from owning broadcast stations that reach over 39% of U.S. TV households. Carr argues that advancements in social media and streaming make this rule outdated, suggesting that it limits broadcasters' ability to compete with digital platforms. Opponents, including Democratic Commissioner Anna Gomez, warn that removing the cap could harm local journalism by reducing competition, and assert that only Congress has the authority to change such regulations. A vote on this proposal is scheduled for August 6, 2026.

Notifications

Hamburger Navigation Button

Navigation Drawer

The VergeThe Verge logo.

closeClose

LightSystemDark

Comments Drawer

Notifications

Comments

Loading comments

Getting the conversation ready...

Policy
News
Antitrust

Brendan Carr plans to let broadcast giants dominate the airwaves

The FCC chair wants to end the broadcast ownership cap.

byLauren Feiner

Jul 15, 2026, 5:30 PM EDT

Link
Share
Gift

FCC-stock-01

Federal Communications CommissionImage: Kristen Radtke / The Verge

Lauren Feineris a senior policy reporter at The Verge, covering the intersection of Silicon Valley and Capitol Hill. She spent 5 years covering tech policy at CNBC, writing about antitrust, privacy, and content moderation reform.

The Federal Communications Commission will vote next month on whether a single company can own broadcast stations that reach more than 39 percent of US TV households.

In a Breitbart op-ed on Wednesday, Republican Chair Brendan Carr announced an August 6th vote to end the national ownership cap rule, which was intended to prevent one company from dominating the media landscape and incentivize serving local communities. Carr argued the rise of social media and streaming platforms renders the rule obsolete, because national programmers can reach “100 percent of the country” without the need to access public airwaves. Under this reasoning, capping local broadcast TV owners at 39 percent “is preventing them from gaining the same scale that their competitors are free to enjoy.”

Add Verge on Google

Add Verge as a preferred source to see more of our reporting on Google.

Add us on Google

The FCC has already said it’s waiving the ownership cap on a one-time basis to allow a $6.2 billion merger between Nexstar and Tegna. A federal judge put the deal on hold while a challenge by state attorneys general plays out.

Carr’s opponents warn that repealing the rule could harm local journalism through reduced competition, and say that only Congress, which set the cap, has authority to raise or eliminate it. “The Commission cannot waive away that limit simply because these corporate behemoths want to get out from under it,” Democratic FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez said in a statement. Broadcasters are already free to make their own websites or cable news stations, just like everyone else, said Matt Wood, vice president of policy and general counsel at nonpartisan nonprofit Free Press. “The national cap is not a special disadvantage for broadcasters,” he said in a statement. “In fact, broadcasters have a special advantage with their exclusive licenses to use precious national airwaves the way they do.”

Carr only needs the support of Republican Commissioner Olivia Trusty to approve an agenda item. But even if the vote clears, it could still face a challenge over whether the FCC has the authority to get rid of the cap.

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

Lauren Feiner
Antitrust
News
Policy
Politics
Speech

Most Popular

The Verge Daily

A free daily digest of the news that matters most.

Email (required)

By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Advertiser Content From\ \ Sponsor Logo \ \ This is the title for the native ad\ \ Sponsor thumbnail