By Ted Johnson
Ted Johnson
Political Editor
More Stories By Ted
- DOJ Subpoenas New York Times Journalists After Report On Trump’s New Air Force One
- Oregon AG Drops Demand For Records & Motion To Delay Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger
- New York Times Alleges Trump Administration’s Reverse Discrimination Lawsuit Was Retaliation For Its Reporting On EEOC
July 13, 2026 8:59am
Getty Images
A group of a dozen state attorneys general filed suit to block Paramount‘s $110 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery, long-anticipated litigation to stave off a merger despite receiving clearance from the Trump administration Justice Department.
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Sacramento on Monday, challenges the transaction as stifling competition for wide release theatrical film distribution, big budget motion picture distribution and licensing of basic cable television channels.
Read the Paramount-Warner Bros. lawsuit filed by state attorneys general.
Related Stories
Paramount-WBD Merger Is Competition Killer, State Attorneys General Allege In Proposed Blockbuster Antitrust Action
Lindsey Graham Dies: Trump Ally Succumbed To A Tear In The Wall Of His Aorta
The focus on those aspects of competition come amid concerns that the merger would lead to widespread layoffs as the combined company grapples with its debt burden. Broader concerns have been on the impact on the creative community and the information environment, with Paramount set to own two legacy news brands, CBS News and CNN, although that was not the subject of the lawsuit’s claims.
Watch on Deadline
California Attorney General Rob Bonta, who led the lawsuit, said in a statement, “The unlawful merger of these two entertainment behemoths would lead to higher prices, lower quality, and less content for film and television, harming movie theaters, basic cable distributors, and ultimately, audiences on every sofa and movie theater seat in the U.S.”
Also joining the lawsuit are the attorneys general of Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and Washington.
“After this merger, for every dollar generated by wide-release theatrical films and basic cable channels in this country, the combined company will pocket more than a quarter. This merger, in short, would create a media behemoth,” the lawsuit stated.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta at a press conference on Monday to announce a lawsuit challenging the Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery merger.
The AGs claim that the merger will lead to “higher prices and degraded quality,” as a combined Paramount and Warner Bros. will be able to extract a greater portion of box office revenue from exhibitors. Paramount-WB represent about 27% of the box office, per Bonta’s office. The combined company will control more than 30% of big-budget theatricals for wide release, the lawsuit claimed, noting that the tentpole releases made up 88% of box office revenue over the last three years.
While theatrical distribution has gotten substantial attention as Paramount has sought regulatory approval for the WBD acquisition, much less focus has been paid to cable distribution, a sector of the industry that has been in decline.
The lawsuit noted that the combined company would control more than a quarter of all basic cable channels by revenue. The result, the lawsuit claimed, would be increased bargaining leverage with distributors. The company would roll up channels like MTV and TNT that were once Viacom and Turner powerhouses.
The lawsuit stated, “A distributor who rejects the combined company’s fee demands would risk losing, for example, CNN for news viewers, Nickelodeon and Cartoon Network for family households, HGTV and Food Network for lifestyle audiences, and TNT and TBS for sports and entertainment viewers. Faced with this threat, distributors would likely be forced to accept higher fees to distribute basic cable channels than they would absent the proposed merger. Those higher fees will likely be passed on to their subscribers in the form of higher monthly bills.”
Paramount has been steeling for a courtroom battle, hiring noted antitrust litigator Jeffrey Kessler, who most recently fought on behalf of the states as they challenged Live Nation and Ticketmaster’s market dominance.
The company’s most immediate concern is timing: Its deal for WBD includes a $7 million a day “ticking fee” if the transaction does not close by Sept. 30.
That’s why the most important part of the litigation may be in its initial stages, including whether a judge grants a temporary injunction that would put the transaction on hold. That’s what happened in the case of Nexstar with its proposed acquisition of Tegna, creating a broadcast station giant. Despite receiving federal approvals, a federal judge put the Nexstar-Tegna merger on hold, siding with state attorneys general and DirecTV in their claims that the merger would be anticompetitive. Nexstar is appealing, but that process looks to drag out the transaction for months or into next year.
A Paramount spokesperson said in response to the lawsuit, “The lawsuit filed by the state attorneys general, in the most generous light, reflects a fundamentally flawed application of the antitrust laws and is wrong on both the facts and the law. We will vigorously defend the transaction and demonstrate that this challenge is inconsistent with sound competition policy and the competitive realities of the media marketplace. Delaying this transaction will only harm entertainment workers who have already suffered over recent years as technology has disrupted their livelihood and cost California tens of thousands of entertainment jobs.”
Paramount has argued that the merger will boost competition, with a WBD combination better able to compete with streaming giants Netflix, Amazon Prime and Disney+. The company also has pledged to release at least 30 theatrical films per year, at a time when much of the industry is worried about the future of exhibition in general.
In their lawsuit, the state AGs argued that the commitment was “not legally enforceable,” and that it would “still permit Defendants to harm competition by reducing investment and innovation, degrading quality, and raising the price of those 30 films they produce.” The AGs did cite potential job loss, but did so in claiming that the efficiencies from the proposed merger do not outweigh the harms done. “Creative content that goes unproduced as a result of these disruptions is permanently lost,” the lawsuit stated.
While Democrats on Capitol Hill have warned about the merger, undoubtedly putting pressure on Bonta to act, Paramount’s lobbying efforts to win Trump administration approval has also helped put it in the partisan crosshairs, even though CEO David Ellison once said that he did not want the company to be politicized.
Ellison attended Trump’s State of the Union address earlier this year, appearing with one of the president’s allies, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) in a photo in which they each gave the president’s signature thumps up sign. In April, Ellison hosted a dinner for the Trump White House and CBS News correspondents in advance of the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner, an uneasy mix of the business interests of the company with the journalism side. And in June, Ellison mingled with Trump as he attended the UFC championship on the White House lawn, an event that was streamed on Paramount+.
In recent months, critics of the merger have held unofficial hearings in Southern California and on Capitol Hill, while groups include the Democracy Defenders Fund and the Writers Guild of America helped gather more than 5,000 signatures from talent and creatives opposing the transaction.
In their statement last month giving clearance to the merger, the Justice Department said that the “extensive investigatory record reviewed by the Division suggests that the impact of the transaction will be to increase competition across the media and entertainment ecosystem, with benefits for American consumers and workers.”
More to come.
Read More About:
Subscribe to Deadline
Get our Breaking News Alerts and Keep your inbox happy.
2 Comments
Cancel reply
Submit a comment
Comments On Deadline Hollywood are monitored. So don't go off topic, don't impersonate anyone, and don't get your facts wrong.
Comment
Name
Website
Δ
- Anonymous on July 13, 2026 9:52 am
As someone who works in this industry, I think we need to stop looking at this through an ideological lens and start looking at the likely consequences for working people.
Look at Spirit Airlines as a recent case study. The JetBlue merger was blocked in the name of protecting competition. The end result? Spirit collapsed anyway, and thousands of workers lost their jobs. Good intentions did not produce a good outcome.
Now we’re facing another potential turning point.
Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery are both under enormous financial pressure. If a buyer like Skydance is willing to invest in keeping these studios operating, we should think very carefully before cheering efforts to block consolidation without considering the alternatives.
The biggest risk isn’t just who owns these companies. It’s what happens if no viable long term owner emerges. These studio lots sit on some of the most valuable real estate in the world. If the economics stop working, financial buyers or developers may see more value in selling off the land than preserving production. Once those lots are redeveloped into condos, luxury housing, or commercial real estate, those production jobs are not coming back.
Our industry is already hurting. Many of us are still struggling to recover from the writers’ and actors’ strikes, and tens of thousands of jobs have disappeared over the last few years. We cannot afford another decision that sounds good in theory but leaves working people worse off in practice.
If your priority is protecting jobs, preserving production in California, and keeping these studios alive, then let’s have an honest conversation about the real world consequences of blocking every merger. Sometimes the alternative isn’t preserving the status quo. Sometimes the alternative is watching an industry shrink even faster.
Wake up. The livelihoods of tens of thousands of people are at stake.
- Maria on July 13, 2026 9:34 am
Great to see people doing the right thing and protecting our business. The deposition list will be include every studio head, agent, and expert in the industry.
The UK CMA, is probably going to block the merger after the new government in installed. They had to hit pause because a new culture minister will be chosen by the new prime minister.
Keeping five independent major studios is critical for the businesses health.
Newswire
PMC
Deadline is a part of Penske Media Corporation. © 2026 Deadline Hollywood, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP
Site
ad
Read Original at Deadline →