Accessibility help Skip to navigation Skip to main content Skip to footer

Citigroup Inc

Add to myFT

Get instant alerts for this topic

Manage your delivery channels here Remove from myFT

Ex-Citi executive says bank sacked her after raising Trump concerns

Former employee claims in lawsuit that she identified issues with risk-management practices

The Citigroup logo displayed on a large blue sign at a banking conference.Citi changed its code of conduct in 2025 to state that it ‘does not discriminate on the basis of political affiliation’© Chris Helgren/Reuters

Akila Quinio in New York

PublishedJune 16 2026

UpdatedJune 16 2026

Jump to comments section Print this page

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Your guide to what Trump’s second term means for Washington, business and the world

A former Citigroup executive says she was sacked after raising concerns about the Wall Street bank’s courting of Donald Trump as a client and expressing broader worries about its risk-management practices.

The former managing director in Citi’s wealth unit filed a lawsuit in Brooklyn federal court this week, alleging that the bank retaliated against her after she had identified “several risk-management deficiencies”. The lawsuit was filed anonymously, using the pseudonym Jane Doe.

The plaintiff claims that she was forced out of Citi in April 2025 after identifying “regulatory and compliance risks”, according to the heavily redacted complaint. The complaint said that the former executive had raised concerns about so-called know your customer checks, used to judge risks when financial institutions take on new clients.

In one redacted portion, the former executive claims that she had raised some of the concerns as Citi was last year weighing whether to open an account for Trump, according to people familiar with the dispute.

In particular, the executive claims that she had flagged up her concerns about discussions over opening a so-called numbered account for the US president, which would have made it anonymous to most employees and therefore hard to monitor.

The former executive alleges that she was fired days after she escalated worries about the internal process around potentially taking on Trump as a client to a more senior executive, the people said.

Citi declined to comment on whether it ultimately opened an account for Trump. It said in a statement: “As with the other complaint filed by this plaintiff’s attorney against Citi, this suit has absolutely zero merit and we’ll demonstrate that through the legal process.”

The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

Citi in a court filing on Tuesday said the former executive was fired six months into her employment “after her colleagues made multiple, substantiated complaints regarding her behaviour”.

The bank claimed that after the former executive confused the ethnicity of a client, she replied, “what’s the difference, they’re all the same”. It also accused her of making threatening comments to colleagues.

Citi asked the court to deny her request to remain anonymous, saying doing so would unfairly prejudice the bank.

Her lawyer told the FT that Citi’s allegations were “false”.

The former executive, who is ethnically Chinese, said in her initial complaint that Citi’s human resources investigation was “a sham and a smokescreen designed to push out Doe because of her race, ethnicity, and gender, and in retaliation for her protected activity of internally reporting regulatory, operational, and reputational risks to Citi”.

Banks are required to conduct checks when they enter relationships with all new clients. More comprehensive due diligence is required for “politically exposed people”, such as heads of state.

These individuals are seen as riskier due to their profiles and connections.

The alleged “debanking” of US politicians has become an increasingly heated issue, with complaints from certain groups or industries that they were unfairly denied banking services because of their political affiliations.

The Trump administration has sought to crack down on these alleged practices, leading US regulators to scrap “reputational risk” concerns from their supervisory framework. Earlier this year, Trump sued JPMorgan Chase, seeking at least $5bn in damages over claims the bank had unfairly closed his accounts on political grounds.

JPMorgan has said that Trump’s lawsuit has no merit and that it “does not close accounts for political or religious reasons”.

After the start of Trump’s second term in January 2025, Citi changed its code of conduct to state that it “does not discriminate on the basis of political affiliation”. It simultaneously scrapped its own restrictions around banking firearms companies, which it had implemented after the 2018 Parkland school shooting in Florida.

Citi chief executive Jane Fraser has a warm relationship with Trump, whom she personally congratulated after his election to the White House. She has met with him regularly and was one of several business leaders accompanying him on a trip to China last month.

Last week, Trump praised Fraser on social media, saying: “Congratulations to Jane F and ALL of her great people. They’ve worked really hard! BIG comeback for CITI!!!”.

Reuse this content(opens in new window) CommentsJump to comments section

Follow the topics in this article

Add to myFT

Add to myFT

Add to myFT

Add to myFT

Add to myFT

Comments

Comments have not been enabled for this article.

Close side navigation menu

Search the FTSearch

Subscribe for full access

Read Original at Financial Times