Dismiss News Banner
Breaking News
FCC Repeals Media Ownership Cap, Clearing Way For Major TV Station Consolidation
By Ted Johnson
Ted Johnson
Political Editor
More Stories By Ted
- FCC Removes Key Limit On Media Ownership, Raising Potential For Major Consolidation Of Broadcast TV Stations
- Judge Dismisses Consumer Lawsuit Challenging Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery Merger
- Republican Senator John Kennedy Warns FCC Official Of Agency’s Scrutiny Of Network Content: “You’re Getting Into The Foothills Of Violating The First Amendment”
August 6, 2026 8:22am
Brendan CarrPhoto by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images
UPDATED, with reaction: The FCC removed a key constraint on broadcasters’ ability to consolidate stations, voting to repeal an ownership cap put in place to try to limit power of any one media company.
The FCC’s 2-1 vote Thursday was to repeal a restriction that limits companies from owning stations reaching more than 39% of TV households. But it faces a potential court challenge, amid warnings that only Congress has the authority to remove the restriction.
Related Stories
Politicians Call For ABC To “Stand Up For Itself” & “Sue The FCC”
ABC Says “Broad And Cross-Ideological Consensus” Backs ‘The View’ Amid FCC Investigation
FCC chairman Brendan Carr said that the move was long overdue given the dramatic changes to the competitive landscape, warning that inaction risked seeing local stations “going the way of newspapers.”
“It is time to restore balance to the broadcast airwaves,” Carr said. “Repealing the national cap will provide essential relief for local broadcasters by restoring a healthy counterbalance to the growing leverage of national programmers.”
Watch on Deadline
He predicted that allowing broadcasters to increase scale will allow them to attract capital and boost advertising to produce news and other local programming.
Removal of the cap — which limits any company from collecting stations that reach more than 39% of the country — has long been a goal of broadcasters, who have complained that they have been unable to scale up to compete with unregulated tech giants as they have siphoned off local television advertising revenue. The FCC move was quickly praised by the main broadcast lobby, the National Association of Broadcasters.
Nexstar Media Group has been among the companies championing the repeal of the cap, having already obtained a waiver from the FCC’s media bureau to merge with Tegna, a transaction creating a broadcast giant with around 260 stations covering 80% of the country. The merger closed, but Nexstar has been ordered by a judge to keep the assets and operations separate amid an antitrust lawsuit brought by state attorneys general and DirecTV.
Anna Gomez, the sole Democrat on the FCC, said in a statement today, “The large station groups positioned to grow even larger under this decision are not local broadcasters, they are national companies that own local stations and increasingly dictate what airs on them. Trading a squeeze from Big Tech for a squeeze from Big Media does nothing to protect the communities this cap was designed to serve.” She warned of shrinking newsrooms, as large station groups seek efficiencies in local operations.
Skepticism of the FCC’s action crosses party lines. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) has said that he has doubts that the FCC can repeal the cap on its own, and Michael O’Rielly, a former Republican commissioner, has said that the authority lies with Congress as it was a statute. Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, in a recent op-ed, wrote of how he negotiated the 39% figure in a 2004 appropriations bill. “Regulatory agencies cannot defy or modify laws enacted by Congress,” DeLay wrote for The Daily Wire.
Newsmax CEO Chris Ruddy told a congressional hearing earlier this year that he was “prepared to litigate” over the FCC’s action, arguing that the TV industry “is too important to be handed over to a small number of conglomerates.”
The FCC under Carr has argued that while Congress “has at times directed the Commission to change our rules, it has never withdrawn our authority under the Communications Act to regulate or change ownership limits.” In its order, the FCC claimed that Congress’ 2004 action was a directive only for the commission to “modify its rules.” The agency also cited a 2002 appellate court decision that characterized a specified percentage for the cap as a “starting point from which the Commission was to assess the need for further change.”
Major station groups were praising the FCC’s action even before the vote. Chris Ripley, the CEO of Sinclair Broadcast Group, s aid on an earnings call Wednesday, “We fully expect people to challenge this order, and we think the FCC is on solid legal ground here in terms of their authority to change this rule and the rationale behind changing it. The FCC’s mandate is to deregulate over time. That was the mandate from Congress, as conditions change, and that’s what’s happening here.”
With the cap repealed, the FCC will shift to a case-by-case review of merger transactions that otherwise would exceed the 39% threshold. Carr has said that a rationale behind removing the cap was to bolster local TV station groups in the leverage against major broadcast networks. That raises the prospect that some companies will get the greenlight and others, like networks with a national footprint, will not.
“Congress never envisioned that local broadcast TV stations would become nothing more than undifferentiated passthroughs of national programming produced in Hollywood and New York,” Carr said on Thursday. “But if the FCC does not change course, this could become the reality in many towns and cities and counties.”
In announcing the plans, the FCC stated, “There may be transactions that would have exceeded the limits of
the 39% national cap that do not promote the public interest and those will be denied. On the other
hand, there may be transactions that would have exceeded the cap that do promote the public interest
and could gain Commission approval.”
The FCC’s vote came around the same time that Nexstar was hosting an earnings call. Its CEO, Perry Sook, said that the repeal “will remove a certain level of uncertainty in future M&A,” and that it would allow broadcasters to “compete on the same playing field in the domestic U.S. with every other purveyor of advertising, and every other purveyor of video that we compete with that has access to 100% of U.S. households.”
But he said that the move may not have a big impact on the Nextstar-Tegna merger lawsuit, as it’s “more about antitrust than the national ownership cap.”
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) warned that the FCC action was an effort to “illegally rewrite the rules to make it easier for billionaires to line their own pockets while jacking up costs and controlling what Americans watch. After rubber-stamping the Nexstar-Tegna megamerger, this looks like the Trump administration’s latest attempt to roll out the red carpet for more antitrust disasters.”
Read More About:
Subscribe to Deadline
Get our Breaking News Alerts and Keep your inbox happy.
3 Comments
Cancel reply
Submit a comment
Comments On Deadline Hollywood are monitored. So don't go off topic, don't impersonate anyone, and don't get your facts wrong.
Comment
Name
Website
Δ
- Anonymous on August 6, 2026 10:06 am
This is all in the disguise of taking away our right to watch whatever we want in this country. We’re all doomed. Time for those who don’t want this to pack their bags and flee before it’s too late.
- Anonymous on August 6, 2026 10:01 am
Sounds great, I think we can all trust big corporations to do the right thing. Always. Right?
- Anonymous on August 6, 2026 9:57 am
It doesn’t matter if the ownership cap is removed because no companies will merge knowing Democrats will break them up the next time Democrats are in power.
Newswire
PMC
Deadline is a part of Penske Media Corporation. © 2026 Deadline Hollywood, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP
Site
ad
Read Original at Deadline →