Republicans bank on a Trump Accounts boost
Trump Accounts launch today, amounting to a significant new economic policy experiment. But can they become a political winner?
By Eli Okun
07/04/2026 10:00 AM EDT|Updated: 07/04/2026 11:19 AM EDT
In 2020, President Donald Trump put his name in small print on stimulus checks that went out to tens of millions of Americans. Now, as with much of his second term, the MAGA branding on his financial policies has been super-charged.
“Trump Accounts,” which officially launch today, amount to a significant new economic policy experiment, with the potential to bolster wealth for American children en masse.
But how much these tax-advantaged investment accounts will meaningfully alter kids’ financial trajectories — or redound to Republicans’ benefit politically — remains an open question.
Though the accounts are available to any children with Social Security numbers, the millions of U.S. citizens born during roughly the four years of Trump’s term will get an added benefit: starting out with $1,000 seeded by the federal government.
More than 6 million accounts have been requested ahead of today’s kickoff, with 1.4 million of those eligible for the $1,000, senior Treasury Department officials told reporters this week. Others will be funded by philanthropic donations or employer matching programs, to which more than 50 companies have already committed. The administration announced Thursday that companies and people can give shares of stocks as donations to the accounts. And just yesterday, the Social Security Administration unveiled a plan to enroll newborns at the hospital when they get Social Security numbers, which could significantly bolster uptake.
The vast majority of eligible children haven’t signed up. Some tax experts worry the accounts will increase the wealth gap, even as they bolster families in need. But Trump officials said 86 percent of the signups so far are from families making less than $200,000 annually.
“Trump Accounts level the playing field by allowing every parent to invest in their children’s future, not just wealthy families with trust funds,” said a Treasury spokesperson in a statement.
Treasury officials are working to bolster uptake with billboards, brand partnerships and work with medical facilities.
Could automatic enrollment for eligible children be in the works? “Stay tuned” for a possible announcement in the future, a top Treasury official said.
Republicans hope Trump Accounts, which they passed as part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, can help shift economic headwinds that have buffeted the party’s favorability. Cost-of-living frustration has so far given Democrats a midterms advantage. But rays of optimism are appearing for the GOP: Oil prices are tumbling after the Iran war’s inflationary jolt faded with a provisional peace deal. A housing bill momentarily derailed by Trump (who’s frequently focused on anything but affordability) is now on the verge of pulling through. And now millions can access new savings accounts for their children.
The caveat for Republicans is that any of these benefits could yet fizzle, take too long to resonate or pale in comparison to difficulties paying for food, rent, gas and health care.
“It’s just more ammo,” NRCC spokesperson Mike Marinella said. “Our members will certainly be using it out on the campaign trail as much as possible.”
The pre-loaded accounts in particular have bipartisan support as a vehicle to help disadvantaged kids build wealth. If stock markets keep rising, they could enter adulthood with several thousand dollars in savings — without parents adding any.
While not necessarily transformational, the money put in the accounts can provide an essential cushion for a young adult. Many low-income adults currently have zero investment accounts or savings. Some research indicates that just knowing one has savings stockpiled can shape a family psychologically and alter future planning.
An initiative with first lady Melania Trump will also allow states to open Trump Accounts for foster children and deposit federal survivor benefits into them.
For children outside these cohorts, any benefits will be less automatic — and largely dependent on how much their parents or employers contribute, up to $5,000 or $2,500 a year, respectively.
“It’s really the first opportunity that the U.S. has ever engaged in to think about what a universal wealth-building program could look like,” said Stephen Roll, research director for the Center for Social Development at Washington University in St. Louis’ Brown School.
Critics of the accounts’ structure argue they’ll turn into regressive tax shelters for the rich, creating inefficient incentives and helping only a small percentage of low-income kids. “If the goal is to … bring really meaningful amounts of wealth to the families that do not have it, this is not a worthwhile tradeoff,” said Christian Weller, chair and professor of public policy at the University of Massachusetts, Boston. “Conservative and liberal economists all agree that this is not the way to [do] it.” Questions also remain about how financial firms will host the accounts.
Ken Burns on Trump’s America 250: ‘Washington needed no monuments’
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who crafted the accounts, has big dreams for them. He sees them becoming as entrenched in the financial firmament as 401(k)s, with trillions of dollars invested. And Cruz hopes Republicans can use them to construct a narrative about their tax code overhaul: “Many voters still don’t know about all those victories,” he told Playbook. “The onus is on us to tell the story.”
Though the idea of “baby bonds” — with the government giving money to children directly — first gained traction on the left, Cruz also sees this iteration with a distinctly free-market bent.
As socialism grows more popular with young Americans, he wants the next generation of kids to have a personal stake in capitalism and major companies’ fortunes from the jump. “In a decade, we’ll have a little boy who’s 10 years old pull out his phone and look at the app on his phone for the Trump Account,” Cruz envisioned. “That kid has skin in the game.”
Democrats who’ve gotten behind the Trump Accounts see them as an insufficient but a productive first step. Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), an early champion of baby bonds, told Playbook if Democrats take control of Washington in 2029, “we can make this a permanent feature of American citizenship.” (Cruz, too, wants the $1,000 seed money made permanent.)
Booker also wants to reduce the friction of signing up for the accounts — which are opt-in — to make it easier for low-income parents with little time to navigate a complex tax system.
“People often believe change happens with the flip of a switch,” Booker said. “[But] you can get a bit of a bill passed, and then you improve upon it. … Unlike the Republicans, who make the benefits for the rich permanent and the benefits for working people fleeting, I believe now we can actually create something lasting.”
For now, the extent to which Trump Accounts make a difference may depend on how much money floods in to build them out — and how many families enroll. The Trump administration eagerly pushed the private sector, and a number of big names stepped up: $6.25 billion from the Dells. $75 million from Ray Dalio. SpaceX reportedly talked about donating stock. And just this week, $250 million from Micron.
Like this content? Consider signing up for POLITICO’s Playbook newsletter.
[@portabletext/vue] Unknown block type "most-read", specify a component for it in the `components.types` prop
Loading
Morning Money
Delivered daily by 8 a.m., Morning Money examines the latest news in finance, politics and policy — and on Fridays, Morning Money: Capital Risk highlights the downstream effects on markets.
By signing up, you acknowledge and agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service . You may unsubscribe at any time by following the directions at the bottom of the email or by contacting us here . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Sign Up
\* All fields must be completed to subscribe
Read Original at Politico →